A positive science only
explains ‘what is’ and normative science tells ‘what ought to be’, i.e.,
right or wrong of a thing.
Positive economics is
objective and thus akin to pure science. It explains the phenomenon under study
with the help of a theory. It also predicts the impact of change in one
economic variable to other interrelated variables. Thus, positive economics is
related to the explanation of economic events as what they are. More strictly,
positive economics operates by use of economic models, logically deduction, and
statistical testing. Hence, positive economics deals with the questions such
as: Why do doctors earn more than janitors (gatekeepers)? Does free trade raise
or lower wages? What are the effects of higher taxes on cigarette?
Normative economics, on the
other hand, deals with ethical considerations and value judgments. In other
words, normative economics involves ethical precepts (principles) and norms
(standards) of fairness. Hence, it deals with the questions such as: Should
poor people be required to work if they are to get government assistance?
Should unemployment be raised to ensure the price inflation does not become too
rapid? Whether government should raise taxes on cigarettes? There are no right
or wrong answers to these questions because they involve ethics and values
rather than facts. They can be resolved only by political debate and decisions,
not by economic analysis alone.
Comments
Post a Comment